Comments on: Regularization of Unauthorized Property under Akrama-Sakrama Scheme

By: gowrissankar

gowrissankar — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:37:34 +0000

What is the definition fo violation more than 50% ? Further is there nay change in the FSI i.e.1.75 or 2.25?If there is change in Fsi rules , the buildings constructed under old rule with vialationsl will not be demolished?Pl clarify if any experts in this law.

By: Rakesh

Rakesh — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:07:46 +0000

My appartment is still to under Akrama-Sakrama. However, bank has agreed to sanction the loan. Is it safe to go ahead with it?

By: shanthanu

shanthanu — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:15:00 +0000

What about violations of Residential buildings beyond 50%. Are they going to be demolished? As there are number of buildings with four floors on 30×40 sites and the violations have been the rule even after the proposal of the scheme in many cases right under the supervision of authorities.

By: magadum gopal

magadum gopal — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:15:32 +0000

they should fix the penalty for violation on the basis per square feet.
for example 20×30 , 30×40, 40×60 they have fixed the rate what about in between dimentioned sites?

By: SRINIVAS

SRINIVAS — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:14:45 +0000

99% of the buildings in Bangalore have been built flouting the bye-laws because it was the order of the day. If 99% of the population violate a regulation, do you call it a law? Then it should be regularized, and further modifications must be made to suit the requirements and feeling of the citizens. REGULARIZE IMMEDIATELY SO THAT ECONOMY CAN BE CHURNED TO GIVE AN IMPETUS!

By: RC

RC — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:40:57 +0000

What about penalty for floor space index violation above 300Percent