<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizen of Bangalore Confuse with Bangalore One and BBMP One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apartment-bangalore.com/citizen-of-bangalore-confuse-with-bangalore-one-and-bbmp-one-326.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apartment-bangalore.com/citizen-of-bangalore-confuse-with-bangalore-one-and-bbmp-one-326.html</link>
	<description>Apartments, Houses &#38; Properties in Bangalore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vswaminathan</title>
		<link>http://apartment-bangalore.com/citizen-of-bangalore-confuse-with-bangalore-one-and-bbmp-one-326.html/comment-page-1#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>vswaminathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apartment-bangalore.com/?p=326#comment-208</guid>
		<description>May be, some taxpayers were confused.

Be that as it should, the fact remains that, the suggestion made to BBMP as under, in all fairness, could have been favorably considered; but for reasons known only to the authority, it does not seem to have been even looked into.:

quote:

According to an announcement recently published in the print media, for paying the Property tax for the current financial year ending 31st March 2010, even an existing payer is required to file once again a SAS return, and further, make payment only at the appointed collection centre. For obvious reason, this is a mindless requirement. To avoid hassle and inconvenience to the taxpayers, who have already gone through the tiresome procedure for the immediately preceding year, so as to make life easier for them, the procedure needs to be simplified. Payment should be allowed to be made on the basis of the Receipt obtained for the prior year; further, at any of the more convenient Bangalore One Centres, as in the past.


vswaminathan

unquote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be, some taxpayers were confused.</p>
<p>Be that as it should, the fact remains that, the suggestion made to BBMP as under, in all fairness, could have been favorably considered; but for reasons known only to the authority, it does not seem to have been even looked into.:</p>
<p>quote:</p>
<p>According to an announcement recently published in the print media, for paying the Property tax for the current financial year ending 31st March 2010, even an existing payer is required to file once again a SAS return, and further, make payment only at the appointed collection centre. For obvious reason, this is a mindless requirement. To avoid hassle and inconvenience to the taxpayers, who have already gone through the tiresome procedure for the immediately preceding year, so as to make life easier for them, the procedure needs to be simplified. Payment should be allowed to be made on the basis of the Receipt obtained for the prior year; further, at any of the more convenient Bangalore One Centres, as in the past.</p>
<p>vswaminathan</p>
<p>unquote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blr_p</title>
		<link>http://apartment-bangalore.com/citizen-of-bangalore-confuse-with-bangalore-one-and-bbmp-one-326.html/comment-page-1#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>blr_p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apartment-bangalore.com/?p=326#comment-201</guid>
		<description>The inconvenience where one is limited to paying property tax only from the office located in one&#039;s ward was not there in the past.

One hopes they will allow this in the future. I can accept for now due to the new system they are trying to limit chances of firther problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inconvenience where one is limited to paying property tax only from the office located in one&#8217;s ward was not there in the past.</p>
<p>One hopes they will allow this in the future. I can accept for now due to the new system they are trying to limit chances of firther problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

